Ambrose Bierce wrote in a satirical realist way. He wrote a lot of books about war because he had fought in the war. After Bierce saw war for what it was he wrote his stories in a way that made fun of war rather grotesquely. I was reading about Bierce and it said that he would not only make his stories grotesque but would then twist it ironically just to make war look dumb. After learning that I think that kind of answers my question I had as job 2. Also another thing I found interesting is that Bierce would always write about women in a way that they were tempting a man to madness that only death or war could fix. I think that shows in Occurrence of Owl Creek when the last thing that happens before Peyton dies is he sees his wife. I think we could have understood a lot more about this book if we had researched the author before reading the book.
Washington Irving also wrote in a satirical way but it also had a mix of
whimsicality and some fact and some fiction. Irving wrote about experiences he
had had or he wrote about what he thought up on his own. Irving like Bierce had
been involved in war but only briefly and his experiences did not change how he
viewed things. Bierce and Irving seem to have one similarity which would be
satirical writing but Irving does his with a light side to it while Bierce puts
a darker side to it.
Of the books
that I have read of each of the authors, Occurrence at Owl Creek and Legend of
Sleepy Hollow, I liked Occurrence at Owl Creek better because Occurrence at Owl
Creek is more interesting and thought provoking then Legend of Sleepy Hollow.